Partial atomic charges in -systems are calculated by generating all valence bond (resonance) structures for this system and then weighting them on the basis of
-orbital electronegativities and formal considerations (PEPE = Partial Equalization of
-electronegativity).
First the -system of a molecular structure is determined and those atoms are identified that are starting points of +M or -M effects. The various resonance structures are then generated starting at the acceptor or donor atoms. One or more topological weights are assigned to the various resonance structures that depend on the changes in the valence bond structure and in the formal charges of the atoms at both ends of a resonance structure. These topological weight factors have been optimized from sets of data on 13C NMR shifts of twelve monosubstituted benzene derivatives, 13C NMR shifts of twelve carbon atoms in nine substituted pyridines, and C-1s ESCA shifts of eleven carbon atoms in seven fluorinated olefines.
shift of charge
topological weight = 1
separation of charge
topological weight = 0.5
If the positive and the negative charge are on adjacent atoms the topological factor has only a value of 0.25
recombination of charge
topological weight = 1.0
Scheme 3. Example for the topological weight factor
The total topological weight factor Wt consists of three parts:
Wt = fQ fB fA
fQ - factor for separation of charge
fB - factor, if the number of covalent bonds is decreased
fA= 0.3 - if an aromatic system is destroyed (e.g. by
formation of a quinoid system)
In the next step, the resonance structures are weighted based on consideration of their electronic nature. The electronic weight We of each resonance structure is derived from -electronegativities
and the electrostatic influences of neighbouring atoms:
We = + fe
qN
- difference of the
-electronegativities of those atoms that
change its formal charge
fe qN- term for the electron repulsion of neighbouring atom
The -electronegativities are dependent on atom type, hybridisation state and
-charge. The following equation is applied:
= a + b q
+ c q
2
Using the product of the topological and the electronic weight the effect of each resonance structure on the charge equalization process is calculated. The charge is moved along the various -system to the atoms of the resonance structures thereby changing their electronegativity. Therefore, the process of weighting the structures and shifting electron density has to be repeated in several cycles with decreasing amounts of charge being shifted.
Values calculated
The following quantities are obtained by the PEPE procedure:
q,A (QPI (A)):
-charge on atom A
,A (ENPI (A)):
-electronegativity of atom A
q
,AB (DQPI (AB)): Difference on the
-charges on atoms A and B
,AB (ENPI (A)): Difference in the
-electronegativities of atoms A and B of a bond
LP,A (ENLP (A)): Lone pair electronegativity of atom A
Example
charge separation |
charge separation of
|
charge separation of
| |
decrease of the number
|
decrease of the
| ||
wt |
0.5 |
0.1625 |
0.1625 |
Scheme 4. Determination of topological weights
Changes of -charges:
atom number |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
6.690 |
8.568 |
3.747 |
Cycle 1 | |
q |
-0.01 |
-0.004 |
0.005 |
|
6.720 |
8.290 |
3.977 |
Cycle 2 | |
q |
0.003 |
-0.026 |
0.022 |
|
6.895 |
7.301 |
4.802 |
Cycle 8 | |
q |
0.022 |
-0.119 |
0.097 |
Contribution of the various resonance structures:
R1: 2 |
R1: 1 |
R1: 2 |
||
charge shifted |
-0.005 |
0.001 |
-0.001 |
cycle 1 |
-0.017 |
-0.005 |
0.005 |
cycle 2 | |
-0.016 |
-0.004 |
0.004 |
cycle 3 | |
-0.014 |
-0.004 |
0.004 |
cycle 4 | |
-0.010 |
-0.002 |
0.002 |
cycle 8 |
Scheme 5. Process of charge equalization including electronic weighting
Results
The -charges calculated by the PEPE method for various heterocycles containing nitrogen atoms were compared with values from a Mulliken population analysis of ab initio STO-3G wave functions.
pyridine derivatives:
Pyridine and 2- and 4-hydroxy pyridine derivatives show similar -charge patterns. The nitrogen and the carbon atoms at the 3- and 5- position have negative charges in the range of 0 and -0.125 e and the atoms at the 2-,4- and 6- position have positive charges in the range of 0 and +0.125. The results of the STO-3G and the PEPE-calculations correspond with each other to a reasonable degree.
R |
N1 |
C2 |
C3 |
C4 |
C5 |
C6 |
O |
|
H |
-0.13 |
0.07 |
-0.03 |
0.06 |
-0.03 |
0.07 |
- |
ab initio |
-0.08 |
0.02 |
-0.00 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
- |
PEPE | |
2-OH |
0.13 |
0.06 |
-0.09 |
0.07 |
-0.08 |
0.04 |
0.131 |
ab initio |
-0.11 |
0.02 |
-0.13 |
0.05 |
-0.01 |
0.02 |
0.051 |
PEPE | |
3-OH |
-0.01 |
-0.09 |
0.03 |
-0.03 |
0.02 |
-0.05 |
0.115 |
ab initio |
-0.08 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.044 |
PEPE | |
4-OH |
-0.07 |
0.04 |
-0.12 |
0.07 |
-0.08 |
0.04 |
0.125 |
ab initio |
-0.10 |
0.02 |
-0.01 |
0.03 |
-0.01 |
0.02 |
0.057 |
PEPE |
Table 8. Comparison of -charges in pyridine derivatives calculated by PETRA and
STO-3G, respectively (ab initio values from: J. E. Del Bene, J. Comp. Chem. 2, 251-260 (1981))
pyrimidine derivates
PEOE -charges of pyrimidines, which are substituted at the 4-position, a show well agreement with the corresponding values from a Mulliken population analysis of STO-3G wave functions (see next page):
R |
N1 |
C2 |
N3 |
C4 |
C5 |
C6 |
|
H |
-0.04 |
0.01 |
-0.04 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
ab initio |
-0.08 |
0.04 |
-0.08 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
PEPE | |
Me |
-0.06 |
0.03 |
-0.07 |
0.07 |
-0.02 |
0.04 |
ab initio |
-0.08 |
0.04 |
-0.08 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
PEPE | |
NH2 |
-0.12 |
0.05 |
-0.15 |
0.09 |
-0.09 |
0.06 |
ab initio |
-0.11 |
0.04 |
-0.12 |
0.06 |
-0.03 |
0.06 |
PEPE | |
OH |
-0.09 |
0.05 |
-0.14 |
0.06 |
-0.05 |
0.06 |
ab initio |
-0.10 |
0.04 |
-0.11 |
0.05 |
-0.01 |
0.06 |
PEPE | |
F |
-0.07 |
0.04 |
-0.10 |
0.03 |
-0.04 |
0.06 |
ab initio |
-0.09 |
0.04 |
-0.11 |
0.05 |
-0.01 |
0.06 |
PEPE | |
CH=CH2 |
-0.16 |
0.03 |
-0.07 |
0.05 |
-0.01 |
0.04 |
ab initio |
-0.09 |
0.04 |
-0.10 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
PEPE | |
CHO |
-0.04 |
0.02 |
-0.05 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
ab initio |
-0.07 |
0.04 |
-0.08 |
-0.05 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
PEPE | |
CN |
-0.03 |
0.03 |
-0.04 |
-0.01 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
ab initio |
-0.07 |
0.04 |
-0.08 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.07 |
PEPE |
Table 9 Comparison of -charges in pyrimidine derivatives calculated by PETRA and
STO-3G, respectively (ab initio values from: J. E. Del Bene, J. Comp. Chem. 2, 251-260 (1981))
Scope and Limitations
The dependence of the -electronegativity on charge is parameterized for the following atoms.
(The functions are dependent on the hybridization states)
Applications
A detailed discussion will be given in the next section using the results of the calculations on both the - and
-charges.
References